You would rather adopt the female role of being an object of adoration and service than the male role of having to take on the loathsome job of championing ego over soul. Homosexuality is simply another level of perversion to heterosexuality. They are both psychologically corrupted states of sexuality that developed under the horror of the duress of the human condition. It should be pointed out that since sex is an attack on innocence as well as an act of love the recent generations of humans who have been treating sex cheaply have been contributing significantly to the death of soul and increase in upset in the world.
What remains to be explained is why the beauty of women came to be so powerfully attractive and inspirational for heterosexual men. So it follows that if the infant can remain in infancy for an extended period and be treated with a lot of seemingly altruistic love, it will be indoctrinated with that selfless love and grow up to behave accordingly.
And being semi-upright from living in trees, and thus having their arms free to hold a dependent infant, it was the primates who have been especially facilitated to develop this nurtured, loving, cooperative nature. So this is how our ape ancestor — and bonobos — developed cooperative, loving moral behaviour. You can read about fossil evidence of our nurtured origins in F.
An accompanying development to the love-indoctrination process was the selection of cooperative, selfless, loving behaviour through mate selection. Individuals were selected for as mates who were closer to their memory of infancy; that is, younger, because the older individuals became, the more their infancy training in love wore off. Our ape ancestors began to idolise, foster, favour and select for youthfulness because of its association with cooperative integration.
The effect was that we selected for the neotenous infant-like features of large eyes, dome forehead, snub nose and hairless skin throughout this early period of our development. A comparison between an adult chimpanzee, infant chimpanzee, and an adult bonobo showing how neotenised bonobos are. What this means is that while the motivation behind the selection changed significantly , the neotenous features signifying soundness and innocence were selected for both throughout the 8 or so million years in which our cooperative, loving soul was nurtured, and throughout the last 2 million years when we became conscious and upset and sought out innocence for sexual destruction.
So the image of innocence has been selected for ever since we were apes, which is a very long time. Once upset developed 2 million years ago, all other forms of innocence were being attacked because it was seen as unjustly condemning of our loss of innocence. So if providing food was not the reason, why did men hunt? By attacking, killing and dominating animals, men were demonstrating their power, which was a perverse, sick way of demonstrating their worth. A photo taken in of a shooter posing with a scimitar-horned oryx, which is a species that is officially listed as extinct in the wild.
The illusion was that women were psychologically as well as physically innocent. Of course, human-condition-avoiding, psychosis-denying mechanistic scientists have been totally committed to avoiding any recognition that sex as most men practise it is about attacking the psychologically innocent state of women for its unjust criticism of men. Essay 14 , F. Essay 40 and par. The problem for women, of course, is that while their image of innocence was being cultivated throughout the last 2 million years, their soul, their actual innocence, was being destroyed — women are only the image of innocence.
It has been an extremely difficult situation for women. Essay 55 for an analysis of the endgame situation that humanity has now reached. For their part, the more men fought to defeat ignorance and protect the group humanity , the more embattled, upset and corrupted they became and thus the more they appeared to worsen the situation.
The harder men tried to do their job of protecting humanity the more they appeared to endanger humanity!
As a result, they became almost completely ineffective or inoperable, paralysed by this paradox, cowed by the extent of their self-corruption and its effects. At this point women had to usurp some of the day-to-day running of affairs as well as attempt to nurture a new generation of soundness. Women, not oppressed by the overwhelming responsibility and extreme frustration that men felt, could remain comparatively effective.
Further, when men crumpled women had to take over or the family, group or community involved would perish. A return to matriarchy, such as we have recently seen in society, is a sign that men in general have become completely exhausted. However, total matriarchy has not re-emerged because men could not afford to stand aside completely whilst the fundamental battle still remained. They needed to stay in control and remain vigilant against the threat of ignorance. But as is explained in F. Essay 35 , the tragedy was that like all dogmatic, human-condition-avoiding-but-ideals-insisting, pseudo idealistic movements, feminism was based on a lie — in this case, that there is no real difference in the roles of men and women.
While the main device for avoiding prejudice was to deny that there was any difference between men and women, another was to maintain that any difference between men and women was simply a product of cultural conditioning — of girls being given dolls and boys swords as infants, for example.
But the differences are, in fact, the product of a very real distinction between the sexes. Men have had an impossible fight on their hands, but at least they had the advantage of intuitively understanding that battle. To be a victim of a victim , as women have been, is an almost insufferable situation, because while a primary victim knows what the primary source offence is, a victim of a victim does not. For 2 million years women have stood by and supported their men, just as for some 8 million years prior to that when nurturing was developing our cooperative soul, men supported their women.
With understanding of the human condition now found, men and women can at last stand side by side. Chapter 8 : 14 describes the tragic effect ageing has had on the lives of both men and women. Discussion or comment on this essay is welcomed — see below. Please note, we encourage constructive discussion about this information and so reserve the right to moderate or decline posts that we feel are not relevant or inappropriate.
In particular, with the subject of the human condition being so confronting, malice can easily occur, and where comments are deemed to be motivated not by objectivity but by malice, they will be declined. It has to be appreciated that the possibility of malice toward this subject matter is very real, and we have a responsibility to manage that as best we can. Please go to your browser settings to enable it.
No 1 human-sex-explained Freedom Essay 27 Human sex explained Human sex, falling in love, women's beauty, and so much more, all at last truthfully and relievingly explained. Initiation ceremony in Sepik River area, New Guinea. Brigitte Bardot. Queen Victoria.
In November Pope Benedict said that it was a responsible act, though still not a truly moral solution, to use condoms in some very special cases as a device for the prevention of disease.
He gave male prostitutes as an example, where the purpose is to "reduce the risk of infection" from HIV. There was some confusion at first whether the statement applied only to homosexual prostitutes and thus not to heterosexual intercourse at all. However, Federico Lombardi , spokesman of the Vatican, clarified that it applied to heterosexual and transsexual prostitutes, both male and female, as well. The Catholic Church disapproves of fornication sexual intercourse between two people not married to each other , calling it "gravely contrary to the dignity of persons and of human sexuality".
The Catechism devotes a separate section to homosexuality within its explanation of the sixth commandment. The Church distinguishes between "homosexual attractions", which are not considered sinful, and "homosexual acts", which are considered sinful. Like all heterosexual acts outside of marriage, homosexual acts are considered sins against this commandment.
The Catechism states that they "violate natural law, cannot bring forth life, and do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved. The homosexual person is, according to the Church, "called to chastity". They are instructed to practice the virtues of "self-mastery" that teaches "inner freedom" using the support of friends, prayer and grace found in the sacraments of the Church.
On 26 August , Pope Francis said in Ireland, that homosexual people exist in whole history of human mankind. He teaches catholic parents to talk with their homosexual children and that they are part of their families and shouldn't be "thrown out" of family. The Catholic Church disapproves of lust : "Sexual pleasure is morally disordered when sought for itself, isolated from its procreative and unitive purposes". But I say to you, everyone who looks at a woman with lust has already committed adultery with her in his heart.
The Catholic Church disapproves of masturbation. The Church does not demonize masturbation, but she warns against trivializing it. In fact many young people and adults are in danger of becoming isolated in their consumption of lewd pictures, films, and Internet services instead of finding love in a personal relationship. Loneliness can lead to a blind alley in which masturbation becomes an addiction.
Living by the motto "For sex I do not need anyone; I will have it myself, however and whenever I need it" makes nobody happy. According to Catholic Church teaching, "to form an equitable judgment about the subjects' moral responsibility and to guide pastoral action, one must take into account the affective immaturity, force of acquired habit, conditions of anxiety, or other psychological or social factors that lessen or even extenuate moral culpability.
The Catholic Church disapproves of pornography and says that civil authorities should prevent the production and distribution of pornographic materials.
For parents by themselves are not capable of satisfying every requirement of the whole process of raising children, especially in matters concerning their schooling and the entire gamut of socialization. Leviticus , 30; presents sexual activity between two men as an example of the repulsive ways of the Canaanites, which the people of Yahweh should avoid. I look forward to more volumes of this standard coming from the Center. It is true that women have often been abused and relegated to a subservient place. Studies confirm that it tends to diminish in the context of long-term relationships. To what extent should our sexuality define who we are?
The Catholic Church condemns prostitution as a societal vice. The Catholic Church condemns rape as "always an intrinsically evil act. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. Not to be confused with Catholic theology of the body or Theology of the Body. For a broader discussion, see Sex and gender roles in the Catholic Church.
Peter's Basilica , Vatican City. Theologies Doctrine. Natural law Catholic ethics Personalism Social teaching Philosophers. Liturgy Mass Divine Office Liturgical year. Prayer Devotions Bible Biblical canon. Gallican Ambrosian Braga Mozarabic. Chaldean East Syriac Syro-Malabar. Byzantine Armenian. Alexandrian Ethiopic. Other philosophies. Ecumenism Monasticism Relations with: Islam Judaism. Societal issues. Links and resources. This section needs expansion with: Specific subsections in need of expansion are marked with small tags.
You can help by adding to it. June Further information: Catholic theology of the body. This section needs expansion. Main article: Homosexuality and Roman Catholicism. Catholicism portal Sexuality portal. Retrieved Archived from the original on 19 March Retrieved 6 January Eunuchs for the Kingdom of Heaven. Doubleday Publishing. Georgetown University Press. Lexington Books. Marriage in the Early Church. Wipf and Stock Publishers.
Kosnik and others, Human Sexuality. Curran; Richard A. McCormick Paulist Press.
Basic Books. Anthony Kosnik editor " ". Archived from the original on Archived from the original on 5 September Servant Publications. Catholic News Agency. Retrieved 21 January Modern Catholic Dictionary.
Eternal Life. Bretzke, S. America Magazine. The National Catholic Bioethics Quarterly : 35— Summer—Fall Josephinum Journal of Theology. Pittsfield, Massachusetts: Catholic Library Association. London: The Tepegraph. Retrieved 20 November The New York Times. The Essential Catholic Catechism.
Catholic Social Ethics. Xulon Press. Catholic Christianity.