Instead it leaves bare-bones lists with little elaboration on the topics mentioned, as well as no ex Wow, for a book published in it's certainly out of date and disgusting.
Instead it leaves bare-bones lists with little elaboration on the topics mentioned, as well as no exceptions to the plain and sometimes incorrect rules they put forth. Minimal information could be gained from this, except that much has changed in eleven years and Edelstein is stuck in the past. Not a bad book if you've never taken a psychology class or two.
I felt like the author covered a large amount of material but only superficially. I would have liked to see some discussion or examples of various psychological traits in famous characters to see how this knowledge could be applied. Like I said, the subhect matter wasn't very deep. Just don't expect any really detailed discussions here.
There were also some interesting writing prompts throughout, but I never tried any. Feb 20, Wendopolis rated it it was amazing. I received this book as a gift from my sister signed! A valuable addition to any writer's library. Shelves: writing. Good reference tool for creating more indepth characters, giving the writer the ability to think about the character's childhood influences and personality traits which define their actions and reactions today.
Bullet-pointed and indexed to help with selection. My copy was borrowed from the local l Good reference tool for creating more indepth characters, giving the writer the ability to think about the character's childhood influences and personality traits which define their actions and reactions today. My copy was borrowed from the local library, or I perhaps mightn't have discovered this book.
Having explored it, I thought to get myself a copy permanently, but unfortunately Amazon has currently pulled the Kindle edition due to some reader comments - perhaps formatting troubles? Will wait for this. May 26, A. Roy King rated it really liked it Shelves: writing , nonfiction. Much food for thought here to help the fiction author add depth to characters. I read many books for writers. Most end up for sale used on Amazon or in a donation box.
But this one gets a permanent place on my writer's reference shelf. This book is more of a quick reference or jumping off point than an in-depth look. There's many lists and charts which make looking up aspects of a condition or disorder easy. Childhood and adolescence are covered as well as adulthood.
In addition to various disorders and conditions the book covers group dynamics as well as body language and nonverbal cues. These sections make handy cheat sheets for any writer. While many conditions and disorders are covered, none are covered in depth. However th This book is more of a quick reference or jumping off point than an in-depth look. However they're useful for getting an initial understanding for further research or as a way of deciding what to inflict upon your cast of characters.
This book is perfect for any writer, and is by far the best character reference book I have stumbled upon. Inside are detailed chapters of all types of character traits plus numerous writing exercises that will help get into the mind of said character.
I've never been so engrossed! A definite read for anyone who wants to create well rounded, eccentric characters instead of cardboard cutouts. Invaluable book for writers, I'll write a full review later Several stereotypes, not all correct. A few good points in some places. Looking forward to the publication of The BookShelf Muse.
Sep 11, Ms. Not to be read as a fiction read in just 2 sittings. Helps build character profiles using certain stereotypes: the divorcee, the mentally ill, the abuser, and so on. I'd really like to give this book a 3. Edelstein has organized this book well. It is easy to read and easy to find the information you are looking for. She covers adult, children with two chapters traits as well as others like criminal and psychological disorders.
She's done a beautiful job organizing and putting this book in a logical and usable format. If an author is looking to create a character outline this is an excellent place to start. She covers other I'd really like to give this book a 3. She covers other topics like sexual issues, love, marriage, and other arrangements. She's very thorough and neatly organized.
I think the problem comes in if authors think this is an exhaustive way to build a character. There are a lot of good things in here for authors to utilize. The organization is stellar. However, there are always outliers who don't fit the mold psychology has created. Any author using this book will have to put their own quirkiness in their characters. If authors are looking for a place to start - and only start - this is a good reference book. This could prove to be an invaluable tool to use when developing characters for more involved pieces of fiction.
Do you prefer writing when you are alone or when you are surrounded by life? I expect this book to be on my "currently reading" list for awhile, since, as I said, it will be something I refer to as I need it rather than something to read front to back. But if you use this book as the foundation and build on it, you can really build a well-written character with a lot of dimensions. To write or not to write? Verblio has quite a few U. However you have to keep your eyes on the goal and ignore the hurdles. The form is editable, but you must submit the final version by the given date.
In addition to that it's pretty useful for giving an insight into the characters of the people around you and yourself. Of particular interest is the table on page that shows the different traits of men and women when they are speaking to each other. This could well be the key to a happily married life for me - now and in the future. Mar 18, Evalyn rated it really liked it.
A psychological reference book that lists the traits, behaviors, and what influenced them in every type from "soccer moms to serial killers" - tool for writers creating characters and for anyone interested in human behavior. Thorough, clear, and concise - by Linda N. Edelstein, a Psychologist and professor of psychology. Jul 19, Scott Kinkade rated it it was amazing. Great resource for writers. Tells you how to write any kind of character, from happy teenage daughter to sick arsonist and everything in between. Edelstein has a strong grasp of every personality type.
I recommend this for anyone writing fiction. This is not a book you should read in one sitting. People would argue that this book is too stereotypical. But if you use this book as the foundation and build on it, you can really build a well-written character with a lot of dimensions. Apr 19, Fredrick Danysh rated it liked it Shelves: writing. One thing that the aspiring fiction writer must do is develop believable characters.
This book analyzes human personality traits and gives advice on developing character traits. It covers a wide spectrum of traits. An excellent reference for basic and advanced character building of a person's actions and the why behind them based in reality. Recommended for everyone. Aug 04, C. Phillips rated it really liked it Shelves: non-fiction , writing-style. A good tool for building realistic characters. Some parts were useful. If anything, it can at least allow someone to brainstorm ideas. Jun 01, Nathan Burgoine rated it really liked it Shelves: nonfiction.
I come back to this book again and again. Very helpful when writing and easy guide to follow. Great reference book. It has helped me numerous times to sharpen up my characters. This book can help people figure out what they ought to research next in other books. And then people should find better books and references, because this is merely a guide. I see no issue in marking down a path of research if this is used like a roadmap.
I give credit to books which leave you thinking, but aside from doing that, it relies too much on stereotypes, and it makes some outlandish claims. I was particularly rankled with chapter six above anything else. Namely: "Sadomasochistic sex i This book can help people figure out what they ought to research next in other books. Namely: "Sadomasochistic sex is usually either heterosexual or between gay men; it is unusual in the lesbian community. Does the entity need to be kept in a glass box?
Tell us! Can you leave it in a footlocker with a padlock on it? While it can be tempting to make the containment protocols for an entity really intense, to emphasize the power and threat represented by that entity, try to keep a sense of proportion. The RPC is big and powerful, but it is still an organization run and paid for by humans. Excessive containment protocols should be justified in-universe. That's not to say that your containment protocols can't be weird and esoteric- blood sacrifices, magic runes, beans- they all have their place in protocols, just remember to justify them.
The same goes for the treatment of human or humanoid entities- remember that the Authority is humane, but they're not running a luxury hotel. Lists of items requested by an entity can be an excellent window into the entity's mindset and personality, but once again keep things reasonable, and justify what you've done. The RPC has to pay for all this, after all. And titanium cages with diamond windows and laser turrets and en situ tank battalions aren't cheap.
A closely related factor to consider is the human element. The Authority is a research organization, and scientists are hard to train and motivate, especially if they're dealing with a "contained" entity that kills people on the regular. Consider how people would work in, on and around the containment system you've created. Does it make sense? Lastly, consider the containment classification of an RPC- quite often people tend to overestimate the difficulty of containing items which are only harmful when "activated", or when a certain set of conditions are met.
Consider what sets and object off. Would it be set off by leaving it in a box? If the answer is no, then congratulations, you're on the right track to making your containment protocols. So, what do they mean?
Quite simple, these are known as redactions which represent attempts to obfuscated or otherwise censor information. Like real-world governments, specifically foreign intelligence agencies, the Authority uses this system to keep unauthorized readers from reading details that aren't cleared to know.
Now, obviously this is all fiction, so redaction serves a slightly different purpose. We redact to keep information vague and mysterious to the reader, or to skip over information that is extraneous. While redaction and censorship can absolutely be overdone, it is nonetheless a valuable writing tool in the RPC context. Articles need to look professional, and read that way too. In-universe, articles are written as part of someone's job, and it's usually an academic job.
This means that RPC articles should not only look like research documents but maintain the same clinical tone as research documents. But what does clinical tone actually mean? Many new writers tend to assume that clinical tone means big, fancy words that would score well in a game of Scrabble, but this couldn't be more wrong.
Clinical tone means precision. Precision is using the word, or phrase, that suits the current situation and unlikely to be misinterpreted by the reader. It means choosing words that are unambiguous in meaning is at least likely to be misinterpreted. To put it another way, the words you use should be associated only with the exact and appropriate thing that you wish to describe.
It's not dangerous unless you annoy it. There are lots of different kinds of dogs. And what does "dangerous" mean here? What about "annoy"? There are too many ambiguities in this sentence. It is non-hostile except when approached and buffaloed by human personnel. This is just as bad as example one, except that it uses longer words which only exacerbate the problem. Instances have been observed to grow up to 65cm in length. While RPC does generally not exhibit hostility towards humans, it is has become hostile when approached aggressively by humans.
This tells you a lot. You know it's something like a bug- and what kind of bug it looks like. You know exactly how big it can get. You know that isn't not normally aggressive to people, it can be, and you know exactly what circumstances it becomes aggressive in. If you are interested in writing an article for the RPC Authority there are is a specific process that you must familiarize yourself with.
This writing process should be followed in order to improve your writing and to avoid "coldposting". If an article is coldposted 1 it will be removed. Create account or Sign in. Series I Critic of the Week: Moist Bread. Critic's Choice: RPC Random RPC. Top Rated Pages.
Recently Created Pages. Recently Edited Pages. Forum Recent Posts. Join the Site! Author Page. Creator Page. International Hub.
Guide for Newbies. Site Rules.
A general resource for writers of novels, short-stories, stage-plays, screenplays, poetry, comedy etc, with tips for coming up with ideas, presenting your work. Apr 18, - The May/June Writer's Digest is your guide to making the most of the Web—and avoiding the worst of it. Most writers I know have a.
RPC Sandbox. Our Staff. Writers Guide. Formatting Guide. Scripting Guide. Tagging Guide. Criticism Guidelines. Canon Policy. Steam Group. Redbubble Store. Brainstorming When pondering an article concept, there are a few key things to consider: Is the concept interesting and original? Is the concept logically consistent? Is this something that would fit well within the scope and scale of the RPC universe? Is this the kind of story or concept that translates well to writing?
Gathering Thoughts To Feed The Idea Itself So, you have an idea that you want to write, and the peanut gallery thinks it has potential. Just remember, a disease that kills you… not all that scary.
Death is a huge mystery, but it has a certain… predictability to it. If you really want to spook people with a contagion, remember that losing control of your body and mind is a hell of a lot more drawn-out and viscerally unpleasant than just outright dying. Death should be a last resort. Writing Cryptid RPCs: Scary monsters coming out of the woods to kill you is another pretty fundamental fear, and by no means a bad subject to write on.
The thing to remember is that people have been writing about spooky cryptids since… well, pretty much since the invention of writing. Monster articles are great, but an original twist is pretty much mandatory- rehashing moth-men or skinwalkers or werewolves just isn't all that fresh anymore. Writing Extradimensional RPCs: These articles are an expression of our fear of the unknown, or the dark, or things that are a lot bigger than us- the incomprehensible, basically. They also give you a license to get weird - they don't operate off the same rules as we do.
However, they still have to be logically consistent, and you'll have to explain them well for them to have the most impact. Writing Extraterrestrial RPCs: A sort of combo of the fear of monsters and the fear of the unknown, ETs represent the fear of strangers- the fear of something like us, but not quite. Something, dare I say it… alien. Alien invasion or abduction stories are another old staple, and they demand the same kind of lateral thinking or 'twist' as cryptids do- remember that realistically, aliens do not think like we do. They're not good, they're not evil, they just are , but in ways we can't easily wrap our heads around.
And that's spooky. Expanding an Idea Sometimes a concept needs a bit of a shove to get it into a full article format- you might have a beginning and an end to the "story" that is your RPC, but you need a middle. What is it about your concept that scares you the most? How would it affect other people? Write something innocent or awful related to your concept, and then write how it got there. Invert it. Is one more interesting? Write about what you don't know about your concept- and bam, you're thinking from the same POV as a poor Authority researcher trying to figure this thing out.
What do these mysteries make you wonder about the concept? Find an image or historical or event or person that just gives you the heebie-jeebies. A good image or bit of contextual detail is the bedrock upon which a concept can grow and prosper- the Discord has an excellent RPC Inspiration channel where you can find all manner of genuinely spooky photography and art. The thing to remember is that you always need to explain why this happened in-universe. Just approach it from the point of view of an Authority researcher writing an article- if you had to change big chunks of it on the fly, you'd want to explain your reasoning for doing that, right?
Remember, always ensure that the article you're writing isn't sloppy or messy and the information that you're giving to readers is going to be understood. If very complicated information is necessary to the total understanding of your RPC article, don't be afraid to add a footnote to explain the information therein. It's better to err on the side of caution and be corrected than write something that no one can understand. The RPC Authority generally doesn't meet complicated objects with overwhelming, blind force. They're working types who have to pay for all this, after all.
Always keep it simple, understandable, and manageable. There are other ways to showcase an object's danger beyond four-meter-thick titanium walls, tank battalions as guard units, and feeding it a hundred CSD every week. Keep Gore Spooky: For the sake of writing dangerous anomalies, try to avoid writing or describing in full intricate detail what happens to the person being affected or attacked by an anomaly. You know how, in the dark, a pile of clothes on the back of a chair can look like a scary monster? Remember also that the article is about the anomaly being documented by hardened scientists.
They see this stuff every day, so try to avoid sensationalized wording and descriptions unless you're quoting a character's personal response. The Researcher's Reference Many new authors have difficulty writing containment protocols, or in making containment protocols that make sense.